This is an interesting drawing, it reminds me of the work of Paul Klee. I made it with a text prompt for DALL-E, the image-generating AI software freely available online. (The prompt was 2023-02-25 17.50.22 - line drawing of an array of connected Necker cubes but draw the cubes in renaissance perspective).
The space in the double lined cube at the front apex is fascinating - such a beautiful-strange, impossible space. It is a desperate attempt at reconciliation, and the awkward cropping looks as if the entire drawing would like to slip out of view somewhere to the lower right.
What a struggle to make the impossible conjunction of the geometry of a cube with the experience of a cube. The prompt seemed funny to me, and I was curious what it would do. One takeaway is that mathematics doesn’t have a point of view and our experience of perspective depends on a point of view. If a cube seen from a fixed point of view were accurately rendered in two dimensions, it wouldn't be a true geometrical cube at all. The parallel edges would converge as they recede into the virtual third dimension. A geometrical cube on the other hand, is more like a mediaeval cube, a pre-Renaissance cube without a vanishing point. That's what the Necker cube is.
Here is an explanation of what a Necker cube actually is from Wikipedia:
The Necker cube: a wire frame cube with no depth cues
One possible interpretation of the Necker cube.
Another possible interpretation
The Necker cube is an optical illusion that was first published as a rhomboid in 1832 by Swiss crystallographer Louis Albert Necker.[1] It is a simple wire-frame, two dimensional drawing of a cube with no visual cues as to its orientation, so it can be interpreted to have either the lower-left or the upper-right square as its front side.
Necker cubes deny the experience of a third dimension -that’s why there’s an illusion.
Art is about perception not depiction. Here's one of my cubes from 2016:
acrylic on plywood, 24”x24”, 2016